2000 Chrysler LHS vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler LHS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler LHS would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler LHS. (246 HP @ 6100 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler LHS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 188 kg more than 2000 Chrysler LHS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler LHS. (327 Nm @ 3900 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler LHS.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler LHS | 2013 Cadillac XTS | |
Make | Chrysler | Cadillac |
Model | LHS | XTS |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 246 HP | 314 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 327 Nm | 358 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3900 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.4:1 | 11.5 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1629 kg | 1817 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5290 mm | 5131 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1852 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2831 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 72 L |