2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 1956 Ford Zodiac
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Neon is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford Zodiac. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford Zodiac would be higher. At 2,552 cc (6 cylinders), 1956 Ford Zodiac is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Neon (150 HP) has 74 more horse power than 1956 Ford Zodiac. (76 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford Zodiac.
Because 1956 Ford Zodiac is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford Zodiac. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Neon | 1956 Ford Zodiac | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Neon | Zodiac |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1956 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2552 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 76 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 136 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
