2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 1957 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Neon is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 1957 DKW Munga. (37 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1957 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1957 DKW Munga weights approximately 144 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Neon.
Because 1957 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1957 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Neon (155 Nm @ 4950 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1957 DKW Munga. (71 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1957 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Neon | 1957 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chrysler | DKW |
Model | Neon | Munga |
Year Released | 2000 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 896 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 71 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1284 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2010 mm |