2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 1966 Ford Zephyr
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Neon is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford Zephyr. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford Zephyr would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Ford Zephyr is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford Zephyr (126 HP @ 4750 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Neon. (113 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford Zephyr should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Ford Zephyr weights approximately 160 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1966 Ford Zephyr is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Ford Zephyr. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1966 Ford Zephyr (235 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler Neon. (157 Nm @ 4550 RPM). This means 1966 Ford Zephyr will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Neon | 1966 Ford Zephyr | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Neon | Zephyr |
Year Released | 2000 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 126 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4550 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 93.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.8 mm | 72.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 7.8:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1330 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2930 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 68 L |