2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 1971 Datsun 240Z
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Neon is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1971 Datsun 240Z. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1971 Datsun 240Z would be higher. At 2,393 cc (6 cylinders), 1971 Datsun 240Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1971 Datsun 240Z (151 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 38 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Neon. (113 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1971 Datsun 240Z should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 102 kg more than 1971 Datsun 240Z.
Because 1971 Datsun 240Z is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1971 Datsun 240Z. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1971 Datsun 240Z (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler Neon. (157 Nm @ 4550 RPM). This means 1971 Datsun 240Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Neon | 1971 Datsun 240Z | |
Make | Chrysler | Datsun |
Model | Neon | 240Z |
Year Released | 2000 | 1971 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 2393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 151 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4550 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 85.8 mm | 73.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1068 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2300 mm |