2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 1972 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Neon is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1972 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Neon (113 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 228 kg more than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Neon (157 Nm @ 4550 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Neon | 1972 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Neon | Cosmo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1972 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1964 cc |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 157 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4550 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 942 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2210 mm |