2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 1978 Mazda 616
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Neon is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 1,688 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda 616 (79 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda 616 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Neon weights approximately 228 kg more than 1978 Mazda 616.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Neon (160 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1978 Mazda 616. (124 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2000 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1978 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Neon | 1978 Mazda 616 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Neon | 616 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1978 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1688 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 124 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 912 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2480 mm |