2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 1985 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Neon is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1985 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1985 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1985 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Neon (132 HP @ 5850 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1985 Ford Tempo. (100 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1985 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1985 Ford Tempo weights approximately 15 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Neon (174 Nm @ 4950 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Ford Tempo. (170 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Ford Tempo.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Neon | 1985 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Neon | Tempo |
Year Released | 2000 | 1985 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 132 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5850 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1150 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4370 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2540 mm |