2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Neon is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1992 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler Neon has automatic transmission and 1992 Toyota Lite Ace has manual transmission. 1992 Toyota Lite Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler Neon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Neon | 1992 Toyota Lite Ace | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Neon | Lite Ace |
Year Released | 2000 | 1992 |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |