2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 1995 Ford Royale
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Neon is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Royale. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Royale would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Ford Royale is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Neon (113 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1995 Ford Royale. (109 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1995 Ford Royale.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Royale (173 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 16 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler Neon. (157 Nm @ 4550 RPM). This means 1995 Ford Royale will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Neon | 1995 Ford Royale | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Neon | Royale |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 113 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 157 Nm | 173 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4550 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 77 mm | 86.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 85.8 mm | 86 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2560 mm |
