2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 1996 Mazda 626
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Neon is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1996 Mazda 626. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1996 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mazda 626 weights approximately 65 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Neon.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Neon (155 Nm @ 4950 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mazda 626. (150 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mazda 626.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Neon | 1996 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Neon | 626 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1996 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 150 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1205 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2620 mm |