2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Neon is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Neon (150 HP) has 97 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler Neon has automatic transmission and 1997 MCC Smart has manual transmission. 1997 MCC Smart will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler Neon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Neon | 1997 MCC Smart | |
Make | Chrysler | MCC |
Model | Neon | Smart |
Year Released | 2000 | 1997 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 599 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 53 HP |
Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |