2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod
To start off, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (469 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 410 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Neon. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Neon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod weights approximately 162 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Neon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod (178 Nm) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler Neon. (160 Nm). This means 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Neon | 2001 Ford XR 8 Xplod | |
| Make | Chrysler | Ford |
| Model | Neon | XR 8 Xplod |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1688 cc | 5700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 469 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 160 Nm | 178 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 1302 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2620 mm |
