2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 5,437 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (574 HP) has 424 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Neon. (150 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Neon.
Because 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Neon | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Neon | CLK |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5437 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 574 HP |
| Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 320 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Fuel Consumption | 7 L/100km | 10.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 9 L/100km | 18.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 13.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 92 L |
