2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 2006 Ford Maverick
To start off, 2006 Ford Maverick is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 2,286 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Ford Maverick is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Neon (150 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2006 Ford Maverick. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Maverick.
Because 2006 Ford Maverick is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Neon. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Ford Maverick will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chrysler Neon has automatic transmission and 2006 Ford Maverick has manual transmission. 2006 Ford Maverick will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chrysler Neon will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Neon | 2006 Ford Maverick | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Neon | Maverick |
Year Released | 2000 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2286 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 200 km/hour | 171 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 62 L |