2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 2008 Nissan Livina
To start off, 2008 Nissan Livina is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Nissan Livina weights approximately 1265 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Neon (155 Nm @ 4950 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Nissan Livina. (153 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 2000 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Nissan Livina.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Neon | 2008 Nissan Livina | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Neon | Livina |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1598 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 155 Nm | 153 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 2405 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1670 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 52 L |