2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Neon. (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Neon.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler Neon. (155 Nm @ 4950 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler Neon.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Neon | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Neon | E-350 |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 57 L |