2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 2011 Ford Transit Connect
To start off, 2011 Ford Transit Connect is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Ford Transit Connect is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Neon (150 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2011 Ford Transit Connect. (136 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Transit Connect.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Neon | 2011 Ford Transit Connect | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Neon | Transit Connect |
Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
Body Type | Sedan | Panel Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 150 HP | 136 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Fuel Consumption | 7 L/100km | 9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 9 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 58 L |