2000 Chrysler Neon vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Neon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Neon would be higher. At 1,796 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Neon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Neon (114 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2012 Renault Clio. (60 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Neon should accelerate faster than 2012 Renault Clio.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Neon (155 Nm @ 4950 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Renault Clio. (94 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Chrysler Neon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Neon | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Neon | Clio |
Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1796 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 155 Nm | 94 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4950 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 50 L |