2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser vs. 1996 Jaguar XK

To start off, 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,996 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Jaguar XK (290 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser. (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Jaguar XK weights approximately 6 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Jaguar XK is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1996 Jaguar XK. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Jaguar XK (393 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser. (271 Nm). This means 1996 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser. 1996 Jaguar XK has automatic transmission and 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser has manual transmission. 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1996 Jaguar XK will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: