2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser vs. 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR
To start off, 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser would be higher. At 4,998 cc (8 cylinders), 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser weights approximately 564 kg more than 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR.
Because 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser | 2001 Mercedes-Benz CLK GTR | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | Panel Cruiser | CLK GTR |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2398 cc | 4998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1564 kg | 1000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4860 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2680 mm |
