2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser vs. 2012 Renault Megane
To start off, 2012 Renault Megane is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser would be higher. At 2,398 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser. (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Renault Megane (310 Nm) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser. (271 Nm). This means 2012 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Panel Cruiser | 2012 Renault Megane | |
| Make | Chrysler | Renault |
| Model | Panel Cruiser | Megane |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2398 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 200 HP | 227 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 271 Nm | 310 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2630 mm |
