2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 1986 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser (151 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1986 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser should accelerate faster than 1986 Ford Ranger.
Because 1986 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Ford Ranger has automatic transmission and 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser has manual transmission. 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Ford Ranger will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 1986 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | PT Cruiser | Ranger |
Year Released | 2000 | 1986 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 151 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1770 mm |