2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo

To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser (151 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Polo.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser (188 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. (170 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Polo.

Compare all specifications:

2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006 Volkswagen Polo
Make Chrysler Volkswagen
Model PT Cruiser Polo
Year Released 2000 2006
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 1984 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 151 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 188 Nm 170 Nm
Torque RPM 4400 RPM 2400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 87.5 mm 82.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 83 mm 92.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 4290 mm 4200 mm
Vehicle Width 1710 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2620 mm 2470 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 57 L 45 L