2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2008 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2008 Ford Ecosport is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser (114 HP) has 5 more horse power than 2008 Ford Ecosport. (109 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2008 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 2008 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | PT Cruiser | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2000 | 2008 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1598 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 109 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2490 mm |