2000 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1955 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 2,425 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1955 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1955 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Sebring | 1955 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Sebring | 12 M |
Year Released | 2000 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 37 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2500 mm |