2000 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1962 Humber Hawk
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Humber Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Humber Hawk would be higher. At 2,265 cc (4 cylinders), 1962 Humber Hawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1962 Humber Hawk. (73 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1962 Humber Hawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Humber Hawk weights approximately 125 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 1962 Humber Hawk is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Humber Hawk. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Sebring (176 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Humber Hawk. (163 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2000 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Humber Hawk.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Sebring | 1962 Humber Hawk | |
Make | Chrysler | Humber |
Model | Sebring | Hawk |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2265 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 163 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 110 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 7.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1770 mm |