2000 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1965 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1965 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 1965 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 200 kg more than 1965 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Sebring. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1965 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Sebring | 1965 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Chrysler | DKW |
| Model | Sebring | Munga |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1820 mm |
