2000 Chrysler Sebring vs. 1995 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Sebring is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 310 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 1995 Ford Thunderbird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Thunderbird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Sebring, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Sebring | 1995 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Sebring | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2000 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1620 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1850 mm |