2000 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2003 Saturn L
To start off, 2003 Saturn L is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,196 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Saturn L is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Sebring (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2003 Saturn L. (135 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2003 Saturn L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Saturn L weights approximately 10 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Sebring.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Saturn L (199 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Chrysler Sebring. (176 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2003 Saturn L will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Chrysler Sebring.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Sebring | 2003 Saturn L | |
Make | Chrysler | Saturn |
Model | Sebring | L |
Year Released | 2000 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 2196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 135 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 176 Nm | 199 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4840 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1760 mm |