2000 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2005 Toyota Tazz
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tazz is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tazz (180 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Sebring. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tazz should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Sebring. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Sebring weights approximately 366 kg more than 2005 Toyota Tazz.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Sebring (176 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota Tazz. (103 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2000 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota Tazz.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Sebring | 2005 Toyota Tazz | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | Sebring | Tazz |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1295 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 180 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 176 Nm | 103 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 87.5 mm | 73 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 83 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1310 kg | 944 kg |
