2000 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2013 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2013 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 560 kg more than 2000 Chrysler Sebring.
Because 2013 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Sebring. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Sebring | 2013 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
Model | Sebring | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2000 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 281 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 1940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4840 mm | 4684 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1798 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2640 mm | 2946 mm |