2000 Chrysler Viper vs. 1983 Matra-Simca Murena
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Viper is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Matra-Simca Murena would be higher. At 7,986 cc (10 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Viper (389 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. (140 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Viper should accelerate faster than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Viper weights approximately 540 kg more than 1983 Matra-Simca Murena. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Viper | 1983 Matra-Simca Murena | |
Make | Chrysler | Matra-Simca |
Model | Viper | Murena |
Year Released | 2000 | 1983 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7986 cc | 2154 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 389 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5150 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4080 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1230 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2440 mm |