2000 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1952 Mercury Monterey
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Mercury Monterey. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Mercury Monterey would be higher. At 4,191 cc (8 cylinders), 1952 Mercury Monterey is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 120 kg more than 1952 Mercury Monterey.
Because 1952 Mercury Monterey is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Mercury Monterey. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Voyager | 1952 Mercury Monterey | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercury |
Model | Voyager | Monterey |
Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4191 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 3000 mm |