2000 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1954 Simca Aronde
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Simca Aronde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Simca Aronde would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 850 kg more than 1954 Simca Aronde.
Because 1954 Simca Aronde is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1954 Simca Aronde. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Voyager | 1954 Simca Aronde | |
Make | Chrysler | Simca |
Model | Voyager | Aronde |
Year Released | 2000 | 1954 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1221 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2450 mm |