2000 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1962 Dodge Polara
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Dodge Polara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Dodge Polara would be higher. At 5,905 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Dodge Polara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Dodge Polara (301 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Voyager. (131 HP @ 5900 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Dodge Polara should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 275 kg more than 1962 Dodge Polara.
Because 1962 Dodge Polara is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1962 Dodge Polara. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Voyager | 1962 Dodge Polara | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | Voyager | Polara |
Year Released | 2000 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 5905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 301 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1525 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2960 mm |