2000 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 1225 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Voyager (174 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 127 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Voyager | 1965 Seat 600 | |
Make | Chrysler | Seat |
Model | Voyager | 600 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 767 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 174 Nm | 47 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2010 mm |