2000 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1998 Rover 400
To start off, 2000 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Voyager (131 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 1998 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Voyager (174 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 29 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 400. (145 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 400.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Voyager | 1998 Rover 400 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | Voyager | 400 |
Year Released | 2000 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1589 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 174 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4370 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2560 mm |