2000 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo
To start off, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 630 kg more than 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo.
Because 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Chrysler Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo has automatic transmission and 2000 Chrysler Voyager has manual transmission. 2000 Chrysler Voyager will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Voyager | 2002 Mitsubishi Dingo | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Voyager | Dingo |
Year Released | 2000 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1800 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2450 mm |