2000 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2010 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2010 Ford Ecosport is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Chrysler Voyager (131 HP) has 64 more horse power than 2010 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Chrysler Voyager should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Ecosport.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Chrysler Voyager | 2010 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Voyager | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2000 | 2010 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 67 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2490 mm |