2000 Chrysler Voyager vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Chrysler Voyager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Chrysler Voyager would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Chrysler Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Cruze (138 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2000 Chrysler Voyager. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Cruze should accelerate faster than 2000 Chrysler Voyager.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Chrysler Voyager (174 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (148 Nm). This means 2000 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Chrysler Voyager | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
| Make | Chrysler | Holden |
| Model | Voyager | Cruze |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1996 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 138 HP |
| Torque | 174 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4740 mm | 4597 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1750 mm | 1477 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2685 mm |
