2000 Citroen C 15 vs. 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace
To start off, 2000 Citroen C 15 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen C 15 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace (72 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C 15. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C 15 weights approximately 525 kg more than 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace.
Because 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C 15, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C 15 | 1949 Simca Type 11 Monoplace | |
Make | Citroen | Simca |
Model | C 15 | Type 11 Monoplace |
Year Released | 2000 | 1949 |
Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1220 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 72 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2250 mm |