2000 Citroen C 15 vs. 1968 DKW Munga
To start off, 2000 Citroen C 15 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen C 15 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C 15 (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1968 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C 15 should accelerate faster than 1968 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 DKW Munga weights approximately 165 kg more than 2000 Citroen C 15.
Because 1968 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Citroen C 15. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1968 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C 15 | 1968 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Citroen | DKW |
| Model | C 15 | Munga |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 31 L |
