2000 Citroen C 15 vs. 1968 Lotus 49
To start off, 2000 Citroen C 15 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus 49. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus 49 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Lotus 49 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Lotus 49 (405 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 346 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C 15. (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Lotus 49 should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C 15 weights approximately 429 kg more than 1968 Lotus 49.
Because 1968 Lotus 49 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Lotus 49. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C 15, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C 15 | 1968 Lotus 49 | |
| Make | Citroen | Lotus |
| Model | C 15 | 49 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1968 |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 2993 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 405 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 9000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 516 kg |
