2000 Citroen C 15 vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 2000 Citroen C 15 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen C 15 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C 15 (59 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C 15 should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C 15 weights approximately 175 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen C 15 (110 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen C 15 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C 15 | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | C 15 | 102 |
| Year Released | 2000 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2160 mm |
