2000 Citroen C 15 vs. 2009 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2009 Nissan Cube is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 1,797 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan Cube (120 HP) has 61 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C 15. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C 15.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan Cube (127 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C 15. (110 Nm). This means 2009 Nissan Cube will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C 15 | 2009 Nissan Cube | |
| Make | Citroen | Nissan |
| Model | C 15 | Cube |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1797 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 120 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 82 L |
