2000 Citroen C 15 vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 1,761 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Citroen C 15 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Nissan Micra (79 HP) has 20 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C 15. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Nissan Micra should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C 15.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen C 15 (110 Nm) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2000 Citroen C 15 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2000 Citroen C 15 | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Citroen | Nissan |
| Model | C 15 | Micra |
| Year Released | 2000 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1761 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 110 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 46 L |
