2000 Citroen C1 vs. 1952 Riley RM A
To start off, 2000 Citroen C1 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,496 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Riley RM A is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Riley RM A weights approximately 360 kg more than 2000 Citroen C1.
Because 1952 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C1 | 1952 Riley RM A | |
Make | Citroen | Riley |
Model | C1 | RM A |
Year Released | 2000 | 1952 |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2870 mm |