2000 Citroen C1 vs. 1960 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2000 Citroen C1 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,216 cc (4 cylinders), 1960 Lotus Elite is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Lotus Elite (71 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2000 Citroen C1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Lotus Elite should accelerate faster than 2000 Citroen C1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C1 weights approximately 293 kg more than 1960 Lotus Elite.
Because 1960 Lotus Elite is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Elite. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C1, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1960 Lotus Elite (104 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1960 Lotus Elite will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C1 | 1960 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Citroen | Lotus |
Model | C1 | Elite |
Year Released | 2000 | 1960 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 66.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 582 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 29 L |