2000 Citroen C1 vs. 1965 Renault Dauphine
To start off, 2000 Citroen C1 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault Dauphine. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault Dauphine would be higher. At 998 cc (3 cylinders), 2000 Citroen C1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Citroen C1 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1965 Renault Dauphine. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2000 Citroen C1 should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault Dauphine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Citroen C1 weights approximately 243 kg more than 1965 Renault Dauphine. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2000 Citroen C1 (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Renault Dauphine. (57 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2000 Citroen C1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Renault Dauphine.
Compare all specifications:
2000 Citroen C1 | 1965 Renault Dauphine | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | C1 | Dauphine |
Year Released | 2000 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 998 cc | 843 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 93 Nm | 57 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 71 mm | 58 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 8.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 875 kg | 632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3440 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1530 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 38 L |